Floyd Mayweather was both ‘devious’ and ‘brilliant’, according to a popular commentator.
In his incredible career, the American proved himself to be one of the best to have ever graced a ring, making talented fighters miss the target with his excellent defensive work.
However, some give him criticism for the timing of one of his biggest fights. When Manny Pacquiao finished Miguel Cotto, the world wanted him to face Mayweather.
Alas, the grudge match didn’t happen until five years later, with ‘Money’ cruising to victory.
WOW: Oscar De La Hoya revealed who was better between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao
Jim Lampley opens up about the devious tactics Floyd Mayweather used
During a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, the host was joined by Jim Lampley.
The pair discussed the super fight between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao, with the UFC commentator voicing his displeasure with the undefeated boxer.
He said: “Mayweather did such a smart thing, but also a devious thing, waiting until Pacquiao was older, waiting until he slowed down.”
Lampley interjected: “Devious is not illegal in boxing. In any entrepreneurial sport, devious is not illegal; devious can be an asset
“I give Floyd credit for brilliance. He wasn’t just a smart fighter, he was a brilliant fighter, he was on his own level.”
He later added: “Floyd was only about winning the fight, he’ll make fans other ways. I call him the first great social media genius. He realized you could build an audience on negativity.”
Would Manny Pacquiao have beaten Floyd Mayweather before his loss to Juan Manuel Marquez?
While Pacquiao ultimately struggled with Mayweather, things could’ve been very different.
Many believe the Filipino would’ve emerged victorious had the fight occurred before his loss to Juan Manuel Marquez.
Interestingly, a Hall of Famer gave his stance on what would’ve happened if prime Pacquiao fought Mayweather.